Tuesday, February 23, 2010

BMC MOVIE OF THE WEEK: OMEN IV: THE AWAKENING

Omen IV - The Awakening
  • Omen IV - The Awakening
  • another victim
Gene and Karen York are the living embodiment of The American Dream. Rich, influential attorneys, they have everything a couple could want... except a child. When the Yorks learn of a beautiful baby girl waiting to adopted, they instantly fall in love with baby Delia and adopt her. But terror and destruction seem to follow Delia wherever she goes. The priest who baptized her mysteriously dies, the psychic fair she attends burns in a fiery holocaust and her nanny falls from a second story window, impaling herself on a merry-go-round. Soon, Delia's mother begins to questions the "coincidence" of these catastrophes. Her thoughts can't help but turn toward the biblical prophesy of Armageddon... the final confrontation between the forces of good and evil, beginning with the birth of Satan in human form.
43% liked it

February 21, 2010: First Sunday of Lent (Year C)

Yes, there’s an Omen IV. Ten years after the last theatrical release, the fledgling Fox Network attempted to jumpstart the franchise with this made-for-TV offering. Unfortunately, the effort turned out to be bloodless, pedestrian, and decidedly non-scary.

But also kind of hilarious. Just try not to laugh during the scene in which a guy runs into an alley and bumps into a small choir wearing blue zombie makeup and belting out Jerry Goldsmith’s Ave Santani chant from the previous films. Can’t be done. And don’t even bother trying to suppress the giggles whenever little Delia torments her new age nanny, Josephine. Irritated by Jo’s belief in “stupid stuff”, the girl  turns all of the poor woman’s crystals black, frightens off her pony-tailed aura-photographing boyfriend, and finally just burns down the entire new age psychic faire. (Is it a sin to be cheering on Satan’s granddaughter during this part of the movie?)

But figuring out whether or not the filmmakers were being intentionally funny comes afterwards. Long before pushing play, most folks will find themselves asking, “Didn’t a big glowing Jesus show up and kill off the antichrist at the end of the last movie? How can there even be a sequel?” Well, apparently there was a backup plan. It seems that Damien’s tryst with that reporter in Part III spawned a little girl (Delia) who then carried her twin inside herself in zygote form. At the proper time, that cell became infused with Damien’s soul and was implanted in the womb of Delia’s adoptive mother by a devil worshiping obstetrician so that Damien could be reborn. So, basically, Damien became his own father, which would make his daughter also his sister AND surrogate mother. Confused? Forget it, Jake, it’s Satantown.

Still, convoluted as this scheme is, it has some truth in it. In the very last line of this week’s gospel we read: “When the devil had finished every temptation, he departed from him for a time.” FOR A TIME. You see, even though Jesus himself (not big and glowing this time around) had just smacked down Satan in an exegetical cage match and sent the Old Serpent crawling off with his tail between where his legs used to be, Scripture lets us know he’s gonna keep slithering back again and again and again. Kind of like in a bad movie.

We are meant to recognize our own ongoing battle with temptation in Jesus’ time spent in the desert. Pope St. Leo put it this way, “He fought then, therefore, that we too might fight thereafter… For there are no works of power, dearly-beloved, without the trials of temptations, there is no faith without proof, no contest without a foe, no victory without conflict. This life of ours is in the midst of snares, in the midst of battles; if we do not wish to be deceived, we must watch: if we want to overcome, we must fight.”

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

BMC MOVIE OF THE WEEK: DRAG ME TO HELL

Drag Me to Hell
  • Christine Brown
  • Drag Me to Hell
Christine Brown is an ambitious L.A. loan officer with a charming boyfriend, Professor Clay Dalton. Life is good until the mysterious Mrs. Ganush arrives at the bank to beg for an extension on her home loan. Should Christine follow her instincts and give the old woman a break? Or should she deny the extension to impress her boss, Mr. Jacks, and get a leg-up on a promotion? Christine fatefully chooses the latter, shaming Mrs.Ganush and dispossessing her of her home. In retaliation, the old woman places the powerful curse of the Lamia on Christine, transforming her life into a living hell. Haunted by an evil spirit and misunderstood by a skeptical boyfriend, she seeks the aid of seer Rham Jas to save her soul from eternal damnation. To help the shattered Christine return her life to normal, the psychic sets her on a frantic course to reverse the spell. As evil forces close in, Christine must face the unthinkable: how far will she go to break free of the curse?
61% liked it

PG-13, 1 hr. 39 min.

Director: Sam Raimi 

February 14, 2010: Sixth Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C)

"So much happens to her," director Sam Raimi told the L.A. Times of his lead actress Alison Lohman. "She has pumps placed inside her body to spew blood, inside her nostril, when she's got this big bloody nose scene. I have dummies that were made with extra wide jaw openings… to suckle her face with slime oozing out of it. And then I had to bury her in about 800 pounds of mud. And then we had puppets that were designed just to projectile-vomit maggots inside her mouth… It was the most fun I've had in 20 years directing pictures."

The best thing about Drag Me To Hell is that Sam’s enthusiasm for his work is right there on the screen. Oh sure, it never quite reaches the heights of inspired lunacy that Raimi’s earlier Evil Dead movies do, but there’s still enough cartoonish craziness going on to make Drag Me To Hell one of the more fun horror flicks of recent years. The tooth and nail slugfest between Lohman’s character and the old Gypsy which takes place inside a locked car is worth the price of admission alone. And when you throw in the completely insane séance sequence, of which I’ll spoil nothing, you’ve got a full evening of shrieks and giggles to look forward to.

Plus, there’s more going on than just some icky fun. As Raimi explained to the Times, the story is a morality tale in which the Lohman character, despite being a likable good person, makes a sinful choice in a moment of weakness and suffers mightily for it. But he didn’t want the film to be about just watching her get punished. “We wanted the audience to identify with her and make this choice with her and sin with her in throwing that old woman out. So once they had made that greedy, sinful choice with her, whether they knew it or not, every moment that this demon from Hell, which was sicced on her as punishment, was coming for her, they would have been guilty of that sin too, and it would be coming for them also.”

What Christine goes through as a result of her transgression may seem excessive, but as this week’s gospel reminds us, there really are serious repercussions when we turn our backs on the poor and downtrodden, the ones Jesus names as blessed. As the Rev. Clement D. Thibodeau points out, “Unlike Matthew for whom the Beatitudes contain only blessings, in Luke, there are curses also for those who do not do the works that lead to blessings!… Blessedness here [meaning] becoming intimately united to God.” So when Jesus says “woe to you”, He’s talking about a lot worse fate than a mere mouthful of maggots. He’s talking about eternal separation from God. And though we may not reach that state as gruesomely as Christine, we can share it just the same by following her example.

Saturday, February 13, 2010

COMING ATTRACTIONS: I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE

I rarely recommend that anyone actually watch the films I review here. I mean, the words “bad movies” are in the blog description for a reason. But the subject of our next mega-review will be the first one about which I can unjokingly say, “Don’t watch this movie.” I Spit On Your Grave is bad in the true meaning of the word. So why even review it?

Well, for one reason, long time reader Mr. WAC asked me if I would be willing to try and find some “truth” in one of the most depressing movies he had ever seen. I suppose he wants to feel he didn’t flush 100 minutes of his life down the toilet that is I Spit On Your Grave with nothing to show for it. I can’t make any promises, Mr. WAC, but I’ll do what I can.

Secondly, because I already saw I Spit On Your Grave a couple of times back in my less discerning days, I don’t really have to rewatch it now to talk about it. I doubt if I’d do it otherwise.

And third, I just recently found out that a remake is scheduled to be released this fall, a remake which the director promises has “upped the brutality and length of the tortures and kills” and has “a very voyeuristic quality and gritty realism”. Swell. Maybe by discussing the original I can stop someone from unsuspectingly dropping a few dollars on the new and improved version. It’s worth a try.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

VOYAGE OF THE ROCK ALIENS

v07

THE TAGLINE

“The story of a guy, a girl and an alien... and the one night they will always remember.”

THE PLOT

Rocketing through space in their guitar shaped craft, ABCD (that’s Absid to you and me) and his crew of new wave aliens head to Earth to find the source of the music signal they’ve intercepted. Oblivious to this impending close encounter, as well as to the giant mutated polka-dotted octopus in the local lake AND the two recently escaped deranged serial killers (I’m not making this up), Dee Dee bemoans the fact that her boyfriend Frankie won’t let her sing with his rockabilly revival band. When ABCD finally arrives he (quite literally) explodes with love at the sight of Dee Dee and, after being reassembled, decides to form a new wave band with his crew so Dee Dee can perform with them instead. This, of course, does not go over well with Frankie. After a series of misadventures, everything comes to a head as the two bands face off against one another in the school gymnasium. The raucous event is quickly forgotten, however, as the two maniacs AND the mutant octopus attack the school. Fortunately, Dee Dee's best friend Diane manages to win the heart of the maniacal Chainsaw, who in turn aids the gang in driving off the octopus. All is not settled, however, as the time arrives for ABCD to return home and Dee Dee finds herself torn between leaving Earth with him to seek fame or staying on the planet with the newly repentant Frankie to seek love... and maybe fame.

THE POINT

Way back during our first year here at The B-Movie Catechism, we reviewed Santa Claus Conquers The Martians, the movie which marked the big screen debut of Pia Zadora. Having witnessed her beginnings, it seems fitting that we now find ourselves reviewing Voyage Of The Rock Aliens, Ms. Zadora’s swan song as a Hollywood headliner. Oh sure, she’s made some notable cameos since this movie came out (Hairspray, Naked Gun 33 1/3), but as far as being the lead actress, this appears to be the movie which hammered the final nail into the coffin of that particular career path.

But that’s exaggeration, right? Surely no one movie could be so bad that it could kill someone’s career, could it? I mean, no one movie that isn’t Showgirls? Back in 1984 Pia Zadora herself, fresh off of winning the Sour Apple Award from the Hollywood Womens' Press Club as the "celebrity who most believes in his or her publicity", certainly didn’t think so. In an interview with John Waters (yes, THAT John Waters), Pia gushed “It’s a spoof. It’s very funny. Ruth Gordon is in it. It’s pure entertainment. The music is terrific. You’ll love it ‘cause it’s campy. It’s the most viable product I’ve been in so far.” Alas, despite Pia’s confidence, the movie sat on the shelf for three years before being released briefly into theaters and then eked out to the home video market. By that time, Ms. Zadora was not so enthusiastic. In a 1986 interview with Joey Ramone (Yes, THAT Joey Ramone), she quipped, “I went through a whole bunch of crap with my lousy movies and pop records. I had people behind me kind of steering me in that direction, but it wasn't really my bag… I mean, I'd become a cult figure to a certain extent because of my movies, but unfortunately it was because of how bad they were.”

v09

v26

Well, who am I to argue with the star of the movie? Yes, indeed, Voyage Of The Rock Aliens is a bad movie. Gloriously bad. I mean, this is a movie which apes a scene from Xanadu? Yeah… Xanadu! Remember that scene where Olivia Newton John and The Tubes engage in a musical duel to the song Dancin’? It’s right here in Voyage Of The Rock Aliens as Frankie and ABCD’s bands battle to the tune Let’s Dance Tonight. They even go so far as to start the whole number off with Pia being surrounded by a neon blue laser light and emerging in a metallic silver disco bodysuit. It’s Xanadu all over again, only… you know, dumber. Let me repeat that. DUMBER than Xanadu! How’s that even possible? Well, at least in Xanadu the scene had a purpose, the swing and rock styles merging together at the end of the song to symbolize the meeting of minds between the movie’s two male leads. In Voyage, it’s just alternating verses of flaccid rockabilly and psuedo-Devo riffs with no apparent purpose other than to leave the audience with their jaws on the floor. Which, I must concede, it succeeds in doing so quite admirably.

Fortunately, not all of the songs are bad. You might actually find your foot tapping along while watching the five foot tall Zadora thrash around in the sand to the song Real Love during an obvious parody of early 60s beach movies. And if new wave synth rock is one of your guilty pleasures, you could even find your head bobbing while the one-time Christian band Rhema bleeps and bloots the tunes Openhearted and 21st Century. But just when you’re starting to feel okay about the whole thing, along comes Craig Sheffer lip-synching to the power ballad Nature Of The Beast while a couple of 80s rock video chicks flop around in cheetah prints, and then you’re forcibly reminded just how wretched this movie can be. (You’re a heckuva guy for beating cancer, Mr. Sheffer, but shame on you for that scene. Shame.) As for the Pia Zadora/Jermaine Jackson duet, When The Rain Begins To Fall, I’m not sure what to say. Even though it has absolutely nothing to do with the rest of the movie, and you never see Jermaine onscreen again, the film inexplicably opens with the entire full length video for the song. And by the time it fades out, even if you don’t want to like it, you forlornly realize you’ll be humming the God-forsaken thing for weeks to come no matter how many times you try to negatively reinforce yourself with blows to the head with a hammer.

v19

v31

But let’s not forget, even though Voyage Of The Rock Aliens is a musical, it’s not all about the tunes. As John Kenrick, author of Musical Theatre: A History, reminds us, “The book, also called the libretto, is the least appreciated and yet most dramatically important element of a musical. It is the narrative structure that keeps the score from being nothing more than a disjointed medley of songs… More than one expert has observed that musicals with great scores and weak books tend to fail, while those with mediocre scores and solid books have a better chance of succeeding. After all, the first job of every play or film – musical or not – is to tell a good story.” Right. So how does Voyage Of The Rock Aliens hold up as a story? Well, let’s look at a few of the things which, according to Mr. Kenrick, a musical book must do in order to be successful.

(1) It should “create situations that call characters into song… move in and out of songs as smoothly as possible.” This is a bit of a hit and miss in Voyage Of The Rock Aliens. Some songs flow naturally from the narrative, such as You Bring Out The Lover In Me which starts out as a conversation in a public restroom before segueing into a full-on lavatory-palooza. Others, however, come across as standard rock videos, such as the aforementioned 21st Century which plays over a Scooby Doo style musical montage of the inimitable Ruth Gordon chasing the aliens around a phone booth.

(2) The book should also “keep the story line clear and easy to follow.” Here, I’m afraid, the movie misses completely. In order to bolster the flimsy love triangle plot, the script crams in countless sub-plots involving the alien obsessed town sheriff, two escaped lunatics, and a giant lake monster. (Or possibly, since we only ever get to see one tentacle, a small lake monster with a REALLY big arm.) And although the movie struggles valiantly to tie it all together, the end result is a broken mess. Still, I have to admit, without the sub-plots, we wouldn’t have the sequence involving Alison La Placa at first fleeing from Michael Berryman only to fall for him during a lesson on how to repair his chainsaw. The obvious fun the two characters are having is infectious and this small interlude ends up being more enjoyable and involving than the rest of the film put together.

v23 v29

(3) Finally, a good book must “make the audience care at all times.” Alas, for most of Voyage’s hour and a half running time, the main character is fairly obnoxious. For all Pia’s efforts to win over the audience with her pixyish charms, she just can’t make the one-note “I wanna be a star” Dee Dee appealing. At least not until the very end. That’s when, out of the blue, ABCD announces that upon arriving back on his planet, everyone aboard the ship will have their emotions removed. Now, how a guy who comes from an emotionless planet manages to fall in love in the first place is never explained. Nor is why he would bother to take his new love back to a place where those feelings would be immediately eliminated. But, hey, that’s the scenario the movie provides, and lets face it, it’s not like it’s any more senseless than the rest of the film. The thing to note is that even though she’s spent the entire movie caring about nothing other than fame, Dee Dee unhesitantly decides that keeping her emotions is more important.

But why should she? After all, even if you don’t count Spock, there’s still over 6 billion Vulcans who seemed to get along just fine without emotions. (At least until J. J. Abrams blew them all up anyway.) So what would be the big deal if Dee Dee had disposed of hers altogether? Well, to start with, that pack of green blooded hobgoblins from Star Trek were only suppressing their emotions. To remove them completely from a person is probably next to impossible. Antonio R. Damasio, M.D., Ph.D., author of Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain explains that emotions are “one of the highest levels of bio-regulation for the human organism and has an enormous influence on the maintenance of our homeostatic balance and thus of our well-being.” Given that, is it little wonder the Vulcans developed that little seven year glitch by toying around with such an integral part of the physical person?

But for the sake of argument, let’s say that ABCD’s people had actually developed a way to remove emotions while counteracting all of the potential physical ramifications. Shouldn’t Dee Dee then be okay in deciding to get rid of the things? Well, no, not really, because there would also be mental ramifications as well. Dr. Damasio explains that “emotion is an adaptive response, part of the vital process of normal reasoning and decision-making.” The Catechism puts it this way, “Feelings or passions are emotions or movements of the sensitive appetite that incline us to act or not to act in regard to something felt or imagined to be good or evil.” Basically, emotions are a built-in motivator. Without emotions to help attach value to our choices, most of us would find it impossible to make even the simplest of decisions. What do you feel like watching tonight? I don’t know, I DON’T KNOW!

v22 v24

But for the sake of argument, again, let’s say that ABCD’s people developed a way to remove emotions that also took into account the mental ramifications. Then would Dee Dee be safe in ditching her feelings? Nope. Because along with the physical and mental aspects, there’s also a spiritual side to emotions which has to be taken into consideration. As the Catechism notes, “the human person is ordered to beatitude by his deliberate acts: the passions or feelings he experiences can dispose him to it and contribute to it… Moral perfection consists in man's being moved to the good not by his will alone, but also by his sensitive appetite, as in the words of the psalm: My heart and flesh sing for joy to the living God.” In short, having aliens remove your emotions would take away one of the avenues you have of coming to know God.

We might need to clarify that a bit, though, because just going with your feelings doesn’t immediately put you on the path to holiness. For instance, that inescapable urge to reach into the screen and strangle Craig Sheffer while he pretends to sing Nature Of The Beast, well, acting on that probably isn’t going to do your soul any good. That’s why the Catechism is quick to point out that “in themselves passions are neither good nor evil. They are morally qualified only to the extent that they effectively engage reason and will… Passions are morally good when they contribute to a good action, evil in the opposite case.” That sounds so simple, but it’s so easily forgotten. Dee Dee certainly forgot it for awhile and it almost cost her an integral part of physical and spiritual makeup. Fortunately, in the end, she realigned her passions and chose the right path. And for that we can applaud her… even if we don’t necessarily applaud her movie.

THE STINGER

"Music, great music", Pope Benedict XVI remarked after attending a concert by Chinese pianist Jin Ju, "distends the spirit, arouses profound emotions and almost naturally invites us to raise our minds and hearts to God in all situations of human existence, the joyful and the sad. Music can become prayer". That’s wonderful. But what about music some folks might consider not-so-great? What passions might that music arouse…

Tuesday, February 09, 2010

PRAYER REQUEST

I like to keep my shtick up around here and not drag too many personal things onto the blog, but we just found out tonight that one of my older brothers has been diagnosed with prostrate cancer. The biopsies aren't till Friday, so we don't know how far along things are yet, but still , I wouldn't turn down any preemptive prayers anyone might wish to throw his way.

BMC MOVIE OF THE WEEK: SOULKEEPER

Soulkeeper
    Two thieves down on their luck get hired to steal the Rock of Lazarus, an ancient relic capable of returning evil souls to earth.
    37% liked it

    R

    Director: Darin Ferriola

    February 7, 2010: Fifth Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C)

    With dung heaps like Legion (2010) stinking up the cinemas, who could be blamed for wondering if there are actually any movies in existence which take some liberties with the Christian religion, but do so respectfully? Well, Soulkeeper does just that, AND does it with a smile. In Soulkeeper God is still the good guy, angels still enjoy working for Him, and, most amazingly of all, the Church is still in the business of acting as a force for good in the world. Not one single murderous albino monk in sight.

    As nice as that is, what really makes the movie enjoyable are the two leads. Rodney Rowland and Kevin Patrick Walls play two hapless buddies who specialize in the acquisition (legal or otherwise) of rare collectables. They come across as real friends, comfortable with each other in any situation, be it some questionable caper (such as swiping Abe Lincoln’s hat) or just quibbling over the fact that it’s Deborah Gibson now, not Debbie Gibson. The two have a palpable devotion to one another that ends up adding an unexpected layer of heart to an otherwise goofy movie.

    The pair ends up being hired to track down a mystical stone the antichrist intends to use to raise a world conquering army of evil souls. Unfortunately, not being the godliest of men, the two appear woefully inadequate for the task and spend most of the movie getting their butts handed to them by the rubber monster suits of Satan. Realizing that only men with pure hearts have any chance of defeating the devil, the pair reluctantly head off to the nearest confessional. However, having avoided the sacrament for ages, each has quite a long and VERY detailed list of sins to unload on the poor unsuspecting priest. Their transgressions no longer on their conscience, the duo find themselves invisible to the dark lord… but only for as long as they can remain pure. Which isn’t really their forte. Chaos ensues.

    Obviously, these two guys would be among the last ones you’d expect to be entrusted with a mission from God. But as this week’s readings point out, that’s pretty much always the case. Isaiah exclaims, “I am a man of unclean lips!” Paul bemoans, “I am the least of the apostles!” And Peter states flatly, “Depart from me, Lord, for I am a sinful man.” In His mercy, however, God never waits on someone “worthy” of His work. (Just because He has infinity to bide His time, doesn’t mean He wants to.) Instead He puts the task in the hands of those of us who are simply willing to step forward and say “Here I am, send me!” As the traditional Prayer of Access says, “We do not presume to come to this thy Table, O merciful Lord, trusting in our own righteousness, but in thy manifold and great mercies.” After that, just like in Soulkeeper, God handles the rest.

    Monday, February 01, 2010

    STILL ON THE CUTTING EDGE AFTER ALL THIS TIME

    Given the bizarre nature of this blog, I'm not really one to dwell on subscriber numbers or the amount of daily hits I get. I happily accept my cult status and appreciate anyone who takes the time to stop by. But I do keep a stat counter so that on those occasions when a spike occurs in visitors, I can take note of who linked to me and give the appropriate thanks.

    So... for all of the dozens and dozens of nice folks who dropped by from that castration fetish forum... Hi! I imagine you were as surprised to find yourself here as I was. Seriously though, I do hope you found something of value and, by all means, feel free to stick around and keep reading.

    BMC MOVIE OF THE WEEK: NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (1990)

    Night of the Living Dead
    • Night of the Living Dead
    • Night of the Living Dead
    A remake of George Romero's 1968 black-and-white classic that begins in a cemetery, as the recently-dead return to life - from an unknown cause – and attack the living as their prey. One woman escapes the frightening zombies to take refuge with others in a farmhouse, as every cadaver for miles around hungers for their flesh. Will they make it through the night... that the dead came back to life?
    68% liked it

    R, 1 hr. 28 min.     Director: Tom Savini

    January 31, 2010: Fourth Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C)

    Whenever you run across (inevitably short) lists of GOOD horror remakes, Tom Savini’s NOTLD rarely gets mentioned. Admittedly, it’s not perfect. The introduction of color undercuts the documentary feel of the B&W original and the cartoonish characterization of Harry Cooper is almost unwatchable. In the original he’s simply a frightened bigot, in the remake he’s a complete A-Hole even his own mother couldn’t love. Still, by the time the credits roll, the movie turns out to be a serviceable effort.

    Unlike other remakes, this one wisely sticks close enough to the original so that it’s actually able to play off the audience’s likely over-familiarity with Romero’s classic. For example, in the iconic “They’re coming to get you Barbara!” scene which opens the original, the hapless female lead is immediately assaulted by a zombie. The remake instead tosses out a couple of red herrings before the zombie unexpectedly makes his appearance. It’s a good jump scare for those new to NOTLD, but it also works for longtime fans because you’re never quite know when such tweaks in the story will occur.

    The best change is in the character of Barabara herself, who spends most of Romero’s film frozen with fear until her freshly dead brother shows up to snack on her. In the remake, Barbara recovers her wits and ends up becoming both the film’s clearest thinking character and something of a mean pistol packing mama. The latter point is probably a nod to post-Aliens Hollywood in which every heroine is required to kick butt Sigourney Weaver style, but the former is an important deviation which dramatically alters the finale. Having conquered her fear and assessed the truth of the situation, Barbara simply walks out into the night to her freedom, the shambling dead being just too darn slow to catch her. Those who stay behind don’t fare as well. It’s a terrific twist, one that’s only spoiled at the very end when Barbara gains the world but loses her soul by committing a gratuitous act of vengeance. Alas, happy endings just aren’t part of NOTLD’s nihilistic zombie world.

    Except for that slip up at the end though, Barbara serves as a nice typological symbol of Jesus from this week’s Gospel. Faced with an angry mob and armed only with the truth, Jesus calmly walks through them to safety, his time not yet come. Of course, as often happens in Scripture, we are challenged to do the same. “But do you gird your loins; stand up and tell them all that I command you.” the first reading demands, “Be not crushed on their account, as though I would leave you crushed before them.” Having been given the gift of the truth, we are compelled to go out and put it into practice. Doing so may or may not put us in the center of unfriendly forces, but the dire consequences of living in fear and never leaving the house are guaranteed.