tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34344059.post6061787319799303931..comments2024-02-16T14:01:23.523-05:00Comments on THE B-MOVIE CATECHISM: WEEKLY NEWSREELEegahInchttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13055947542189758831noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34344059.post-62772582761880827842008-09-27T23:56:00.000-04:002008-09-27T23:56:00.000-04:00He's certainly no darling of those who oppose circ...He's certainly no darling of those who oppose circumcision. David Gollaher wrote "Remondino's so-called facts are a rambling, slapdash collection of folklore, conjecture, and psuedo-science." Ouch. Thanks to my old art history classes, I can say for certain that the ancient Egyptians practiced circumcision. The rest, as I mentioned, is just a theory.EegahInchttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13055947542189758831noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34344059.post-32645770915104758632008-09-27T22:13:00.000-04:002008-09-27T22:13:00.000-04:00Remondino, a turn-of-the-20th-century San Deigo re...<A HREF="http://www.circumstitions.com/remondino.html" REL="nofollow">Remondino</A>, a turn-of-the-20th-century San Deigo respiratory specialist, was very fond of the sound of his own imagination. (He spun the idea that "the sole function of the foreskin was to protect the glans when running through brambles naked" out of whole cloth.) He gives no references. He might be right about anything, he might be wrong, but he sure was fond of circumcision.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com