Tuesday, February 09, 2010

PRAYER REQUEST

I like to keep my shtick up around here and not drag too many personal things onto the blog, but we just found out tonight that one of my older brothers has been diagnosed with prostrate cancer. The biopsies aren't till Friday, so we don't know how far along things are yet, but still , I wouldn't turn down any preemptive prayers anyone might wish to throw his way.

Labels:

StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

BMC MOVIE OF THE WEEK: SOULKEEPER

Soulkeeper
    Two thieves down on their luck get hired to steal the Rock of Lazarus, an ancient relic capable of returning evil souls to earth.
    37% liked it

    R

    Director: Darin Ferriola

    February 7, 2010: Fifth Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C)

    With dung heaps like Legion (2010) stinking up the cinemas, who could be blamed for wondering if there are actually any movies in existence which take some liberties with the Christian religion, but do so respectfully? Well, Soulkeeper does just that, AND does it with a smile. In Soulkeeper God is still the good guy, angels still enjoy working for Him, and, most amazingly of all, the Church is still in the business of acting as a force for good in the world. Not one single murderous albino monk in sight.

    As nice as that is, what really makes the movie enjoyable are the two leads. Rodney Rowland and Kevin Patrick Walls play two hapless buddies who specialize in the acquisition (legal or otherwise) of rare collectables. They come across as real friends, comfortable with each other in any situation, be it some questionable caper (such as swiping Abe Lincoln’s hat) or just quibbling over the fact that it’s Deborah Gibson now, not Debbie Gibson. The two have a palpable devotion to one another that ends up adding an unexpected layer of heart to an otherwise goofy movie.

    The pair ends up being hired to track down a mystical stone the antichrist intends to use to raise a world conquering army of evil souls. Unfortunately, not being the godliest of men, the two appear woefully inadequate for the task and spend most of the movie getting their butts handed to them by the rubber monster suits of Satan. Realizing that only men with pure hearts have any chance of defeating the devil, the pair reluctantly head off to the nearest confessional. However, having avoided the sacrament for ages, each has quite a long and VERY detailed list of sins to unload on the poor unsuspecting priest. Their transgressions no longer on their conscience, the duo find themselves invisible to the dark lord… but only for as long as they can remain pure. Which isn’t really their forte. Chaos ensues.

    Obviously, these two guys would be among the last ones you’d expect to be entrusted with a mission from God. But as this week’s readings point out, that’s pretty much always the case. Isaiah exclaims, “I am a man of unclean lips!” Paul bemoans, “I am the least of the apostles!” And Peter states flatly, “Depart from me, Lord, for I am a sinful man.” In His mercy, however, God never waits on someone “worthy” of His work. (Just because He has infinity to bide His time, doesn’t mean He wants to.) Instead He puts the task in the hands of those of us who are simply willing to step forward and say “Here I am, send me!” As the traditional Prayer of Access says, “We do not presume to come to this thy Table, O merciful Lord, trusting in our own righteousness, but in thy manifold and great mercies.” After that, just like in Soulkeeper, God handles the rest.

    Labels:

    StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

    Monday, February 01, 2010

    STILL ON THE CUTTING EDGE AFTER ALL THIS TIME

    Given the bizarre nature of this blog, I'm not really one to dwell on subscriber numbers or the amount of daily hits I get. I happily accept my cult status and appreciate anyone who takes the time to stop by. But I do keep a stat counter so that on those occasions when a spike occurs in visitors, I can take note of who linked to me and give the appropriate thanks.

    So... for all of the dozens and dozens of nice folks who dropped by from that castration fetish forum... Hi! I imagine you were as surprised to find yourself here as I was. Seriously though, I do hope you found something of value and, by all means, feel free to stick around and keep reading.

    Labels:

    StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

    BMC MOVIE OF THE WEEK: NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD (1990)

    Night of the Living Dead
    • Night of the Living Dead
    • Night of the Living Dead
    A remake of George Romero's 1968 black-and-white classic that begins in a cemetery, as the recently-dead return to life - from an unknown cause – and attack the living as their prey. One woman escapes the frightening zombies to take refuge with others in a farmhouse, as every cadaver for miles around hungers for their flesh. Will they make it through the night... that the dead came back to life?
    68% liked it

    R, 1 hr. 28 min.     Director: Tom Savini

    January 31, 2010: Fourth Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C)

    Whenever you run across (inevitably short) lists of GOOD horror remakes, Tom Savini’s NOTLD rarely gets mentioned. Admittedly, it’s not perfect. The introduction of color undercuts the documentary feel of the B&W original and the cartoonish characterization of Harry Cooper is almost unwatchable. In the original he’s simply a frightened bigot, in the remake he’s a complete A-Hole even his own mother couldn’t love. Still, by the time the credits roll, the movie turns out to be a serviceable effort.

    Unlike other remakes, this one wisely sticks close enough to the original so that it’s actually able to play off the audience’s likely over-familiarity with Romero’s classic. For example, in the iconic “They’re coming to get you Barbara!” scene which opens the original, the hapless female lead is immediately assaulted by a zombie. The remake instead tosses out a couple of red herrings before the zombie unexpectedly makes his appearance. It’s a good jump scare for those new to NOTLD, but it also works for longtime fans because you’re never quite know when such tweaks in the story will occur.

    The best change is in the character of Barabara herself, who spends most of Romero’s film frozen with fear until her freshly dead brother shows up to snack on her. In the remake, Barbara recovers her wits and ends up becoming both the film’s clearest thinking character and something of a mean pistol packing mama. The latter point is probably a nod to post-Aliens Hollywood in which every heroine is required to kick butt Sigourney Weaver style, but the former is an important deviation which dramatically alters the finale. Having conquered her fear and assessed the truth of the situation, Barbara simply walks out into the night to her freedom, the shambling dead being just too darn slow to catch her. Those who stay behind don’t fare as well. It’s a terrific twist, one that’s only spoiled at the very end when Barbara gains the world but loses her soul by committing a gratuitous act of vengeance. Alas, happy endings just aren’t part of NOTLD’s nihilistic zombie world.

    Except for that slip up at the end though, Barbara serves as a nice typological symbol of Jesus from this week’s Gospel. Faced with an angry mob and armed only with the truth, Jesus calmly walks through them to safety, his time not yet come. Of course, as often happens in Scripture, we are challenged to do the same. “But do you gird your loins; stand up and tell them all that I command you.” the first reading demands, “Be not crushed on their account, as though I would leave you crushed before them.” Having been given the gift of the truth, we are compelled to go out and put it into practice. Doing so may or may not put us in the center of unfriendly forces, but the dire consequences of living in fear and never leaving the house are guaranteed.

    Labels:

    StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

    Tuesday, January 26, 2010

    BMC MOVIE OF THE WEEK: DORORO

    Dororo
    • Kou Shibasaki
    • Kou Shibasaki
    A female warrior who was raised as a man joins a young samurai's quest to recover 48 of his body parts from 48 demons and to avenge her parents death.
    68% liked it

    Unrated, 2 hr. 19 min.

    Director: Akihiko Shiota

    January 24, 2010: Third Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C)

    You just don’t get plot descriptions like that in American films, do you? Movies like Dororo require a copious amount of suspension of disbelief, especially for us literal minded western audiences. But once you accept the very fairytale conceit that a newborn infant resembling a giant Tic-Tac with a mouth can survive with no internal organs, then the rest of the film is clear sailing. And, I might add, a blast to watch, what with it’s generous heapings of wire-fu and monsters straight out of Japanese folklore. Jorōgumo, daitengu, and hanyō, oh my!

    But this is no mere chop-socky flick. Based on the mega-popular 1960s manga by the legendary Osamu Tezuka (Japan’s Walt Disney), Dororo touches (lightly) on the lasting physical and mental scars wartime can bring, especially to children. As Hyakkimaru struggles to understand how his warlord father could have made a pact to provide his unborn son’s body parts to demons in exchange for victory in battle, it’s hard not to imagine the questions the post-war generation had for their elders. In Dororo, like many other Japanese tales that originated in the 50s and 60s, Hiroshima and Nagasaki lie just under the surface.

    Dororo also addresses (again, lightly) concerns of a more personal nature. For instance, it seems kind of odd that the hero would even bother trying to reclaim his stolen body parts. After all, the mystical limbs and organs provided to the infant by a kindly sorcerer effectively transform Hyakkimaru into a superhero, a type of proto-Wolverine  who can pop off his forearms to reveal two kitana blades. So why would he want to get rid of the upgrades? My best guess is that it has something to do with the Shinto religion’s emphasis on the purity and wholeness of the physical body as a reflection on the state of the soul. This is subtly illustrated in the film in the way the hero’s desire for revenge lessens over the course of the story. You see, in Shinto, to seek revenge, even for a reason as understandable as Hyakkimaru’s, shows a deficiency in the soul. So it’s natural that as the hero repairs his body, he likewise repairs his soul, and the need for revenge dissipates.

    I couldn’t help but recall Hyakkimaru’s plight as I pondered this week’s reading from I Corinthians in which St. Paul explains how we each make up a part of the body of Christ. The Catechism explains that “the comparison of the Church with the body casts light on the intimate bond between Christ and his Church. Not only is she gathered around him; she is united in him, in his body.” Unfortunately, it seems like God, much like the hero in this movie, is always having to track down the stray parts of his “body” in order to bring them back into the completeness of unity.

    There is an important  difference, of course. Hyakkimaru’s search for the parts of his body reflected something missing in himself; God’s search for His reflects something missing in us. As James Cavanaugh, writing in the Denver Catholic Register, notes, “God does not “need” us in the sense that he is somehow dependent on us or incomplete without us. But God does desire us. More precisely, God desires to give himself to us. C.S. Lewis said it beautifully, “In God there is no hunger that needs to be filled; only plenteousness that desires to give.”

    Labels:

    StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

    Tuesday, January 19, 2010

    BMC MOVIE OF THE WEEK: ANGELS’ BRIGADE

    Angels' Brigade (Angels Revenge) (Seven from Heaven)
      Six sexy women, and a teenage girl, devastate a right-wing militia before doing battle with ruthless drug pushers.
      16% liked it

      PG

      Director: Greydon Clark

      January 17, 2010: Second Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C)

      Jiggle TV (a real term) consisted of tamely titillating shows from the 70s like Charlie’s Angels which, as the Encyclopedia Brittanica explains, “inherited a television culture that was more open, and tolerant than ever before… [and] tended to feature young, attractive, often scantily clad women (and later men as well).” In other words, the writing played second fiddle to the wardrobe (or  lack thereof). In terms of ratings, it was a massively successful formula. In terms of quality… well… 

      Angels’ Brigade appears to have been a feeble attempt to duplicate the success of Jiggle TV on the big screen, but one has to wonder why as movie-going audiences in 1979 were already lining up to see much more explicit stuff like Blake Edward’s “10”. Obviously one reason was that Charlie’s Angels alone was still pulling in about 18 million viewers a week. But the other reason was probably because you couldn’t (or at least shouldn’t) take the kids to go watch Bo Derek drop her drawers. Jiggle, relatively speaking, was more kid friendly.

      And make no mistake, Angels’ Brigade is a kid’s movie. None of the ladies are ever in any real danger (there’s one easily shrugged off flesh wound), the deaths are violent yet bloodless, and the villains are cartoonish. (Gilligan’s Mr. Howell as a racist right-wing militia commander?) Most telling is the fact that the Brigade itself is presented more like G.I.Joe action figures rather than as a collection of real individuals. I can’t remember their names, but I CAN remember there’s an kitana-wielding Asian lady who knows kung-fu, a street tough black chick who rides a motorcycle, and even a fashion model whose specialty is (honest to God) jiggling.

      On this last point, the movie basically dips into G.I.Joe PSA territory as one character lets us know (and knowing is half the battle) that while individual talents are important, they reach their highest fruition when combined with the talents of others and put to use for the greater good. Oddly, it’s rather reminiscent of this week’s second reading from 1 Corinthians in which St. Paul goes over the various spiritual charisms, those graces such as prophecy and discernment which the Holy Spirit distributes “individually to each person as he wishes”.

      As Pope Benedict XVI notes, while the gifts are individual, “what is important… is that all the charisms cooperate together for the building up of the community and that they not become instead a motive of laceration... Obviously, to underline the need for unity does not mean to hold that one must make ecclesial life uniform and flat according to one way of operating… [but] everything should concur to build the ecclesial fabric in an orderly way, not only without deadlocks, but also without flights or tears.” Basically, it’s the same call the ladies of the Angels’ Brigade heeded, only we Christians are expected not to jiggle as much while doing the same.

      Labels:

      StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

      Thursday, January 14, 2010

      SHORT FEATURE: THE DONNIE & MARIE STAR WARS SPECIAL

      I know I just tortured everyone with the French Fried Star Wars post, but just to show you what a cruel S.O.B. I can be sometimes, I’m gonna follow it right up with this.

      For those of you who managed keep your heads from imploding, I think the lesson here is obvious. Just because you CAN insert popular musical forms into a particular setting doesn’t necessarily mean you always SHOULD.

      It was that very train of thought which led the soon to be Pope Benedict XVI to write in The Spirit Of The Liturgy, “Not every kind of music can have a place in Christian worship. It has its standards, and that standard is the Lo­gos. If we want to know whom we are dealing with, the Holy Spirit or the unholy spirit, we have to remember that it is the Holy Spirit who moves us to say, “Jesus is Lord” (~Cor 12:3). The Holy Spirit leads us to the Logos, and he leads us to a music that serves the Logos as a sign of the sursum corda, the lifting up of the human heart. Does it integrate man by drawing him to what is above, or does it cause his disintegration into formless intoxication or mere sensuality? That is the criterion for a music in harmony with logos, a form of that logike latreia (reasonable, logos-worthy worship).”

      From that statement he went on to basically trash “modern so-called ‘classical’ music” (“an elitist ghetto”), pop music (“a cult of the banal”), and rock music (no more than an “expression of elemental passions”). But do these kinds of personal reservations from the pope necessarily exclude the use of popular forms of music in liturgy or insinuate that chant should be brought back as the go-to option for music at mass? Well, while such a move would hardly break my heart given my own taste in liturgical music, the actual answer appears to be… no, not really. In his book, Cardinal Ratzinger also pointed out that we have to take into consideration “the cultural universalization that the Church has to undertake if she wants to get beyond the boundaries of the European mind. This is the question of what in­culturation should look like in the realm of sacred music if, on the one hand, the identity of Christianity is to be preserved and, on the other, its universality is to be ex­pressed in local forms.”

      Reflecting on this tension in his Chirograph on Sacred Music, Pope John Paul II wrote that “It is not, of course, a question of imitating Gregorian chant but rather of ensuring that new compositions are imbued with the same spirit that inspired and little by little came to shape it. Only an artist who is profoundly steeped in the sensus Ecclesiae can attempt to perceive and express in melody the truth of the Mystery that is celebrated in the Liturgy. In this perspective, in my Letter to Artists I wrote: "How many sacred works have been composed through the centuries by people deeply imbued with the sense of mystery! The faith of countless believers has been nourished by melodies flowing from the hearts of other believers, either introduced into the Liturgy or used as an aid to dignified worship. In song, faith is experienced as vibrant joy, love and confident expectation of the saving intervention of God"

      Labels:

      StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

      Monday, January 11, 2010

      BMC MOVIE OF THE WEEK: HOUSE OF FRANKENSTEIN

      House of Frankenstein
      • Gleen Strange as Frankenstein
      • Boris Karloff and John Carradine
      After escaping from an asylum the mad Dr. Niemann (Boris Karloff) and his hunch back assistant (J. Carrol Naish) revive Count Dracula (John Carradine), the Wolf Man (Lon Chaney Jr.) and the Frankenstein monster (Glenn Strange) in order to extract revenge upon their many enemies.
      52% liked it

      Unrated, 1 hr. 11 min.

      Director: Erle C. Kenton

      January 10, 2010: The Baptism of the Lord (Year C)

      “All the Screen's Titans of Terror - Together in the Greatest of All Screen Sensations!” So proclaimed the posters for House Of Frankenstein, heralding the fact that for the first time ever, Universal’s unholy trinity of classic monsters would share a single screen together. Sort of.

      The problem is that the movie plays more like two short stories thread-barely stitched together rather than as a complete film. Dracula is revived by the eeeevil Dr. Niemann, but is dispatched halfway through the film when he proves uncontrollable. Only then does Niemann move on to Castle Frankenstein where he thaws out The Wolfman and The Monster. From there the movie follows the lycanthropic Larry Talbot as he mopes around while the comatose Monster lies strapped to a table. Only near the end do things pick up as Larry wolfs out just in time to take a silver bullet and the monster wakes up long enough to drag Niemann into a pool of quicksand.

      Don’t get me wrong, if you’re a fan of the old Universal Monsters, there’s still fun to be had in House Of Frankenstein. There’s all the requisite foggy moors and full moons. And its hard to deny the charms of a movie where a homicidal lecherous hunchback gets tossed out a castle window. But ultimately, the film leaves you feeling just a tad bit gypped because the three monsters, while technically in the same movie, are never all onscreen together at the same time.

      If you really want to see three big names come together and see it done right, look no further than this week’s reading on the Baptism of Jesus, an event which marks the first explicit appearance of the Holy Trinity in scripture. As Pope John Paul II described it, “At the centre of the scene we see the figure of Christ, the Messiah who fulfils all righteousness. He is the one who brings the divine plan of salvation to fulfillment, humbly showing his solidarity with sinners. His voluntary humbling wins him a wondrous exaltation: the Father's voice from heaven resounds above him, proclaiming: "This is my beloved Son, with whom I am well pleased"… The Holy Spirit descends on Jesus as the power of superabundant love. Referring precisely to Jesus' Baptism, the Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches:  "The Spirit whom Jesus possessed in fullness from his conception comes to "rest on him”'. Jesus will be the source of the Spirit for all mankind". The whole Trinity is therefore present at the Jordan to reveal this mystery, to authenticate and support Christ's mission and to indicate that with him salvation history has entered its central and definitive phase.”

      As a former actor, JPII seems to have recognized the epically cinematic nature of the scene. “It involves time and space, human life and the cosmic order”, he exclaimed, “but first of all the three divine Persons.” Now that’s a tagline for a movie poster!

      Labels:

      StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

      SHORT FEATURE: FRENCH FRIED STAR WARS

      While we’re still on the subject of musicals (I’ll get that review of Voyage Of The Rock Aliens out soon, I promise), I might as well post this video which is currently making the rounds on the Internet.

      I can declare war on France for this, right? It has to be covered somewhere in Just War Theory. If not, it should be. And do we need any more proof than this video that dancing IS NOT appropriate for all subject matter.

      That’s why Pope Benedict XVI, then writing as a Cardinal, explicitly stated in his book Spirit Of The Liturgy that “Dancing is not a form of expression for the Christian liturgy. In about the third century, there was an attempt in certain Gnostic-Docetic circles to introduce it into the liturgy. For these people, the Crucifixion was only an ap­pearance. Before the Passion, Christ had abandoned the body that in any case he had never really assumed. Danc­ing could take the place of the liturgy of the Cross, be­cause, after all, the Cross was only an appearance. The cultic dances of the different religions have different pur­poses—incantation, imitative magic, mystical ecstasy— none of which is compatible with the essential purpose of the liturgy of the “reasonable sacrifice”. It is totally absurd to try to make the liturgy “attractive” by introducing dancing pantomimes (wherever possible performed by professional dance troupes), which frequently (and rightly, from the professionals’ point of view) end with applause. Wherever applause breaks out in the liturgy because of some human achievement, it is a sure sign that the essence of liturgy has totally disappeared and been replaced by a kind of religious entertainment. Such attrac­tiveness fades quickly—it cannot compete in the market of leisure pursuits, incorporating as it increasingly does various forms of religious titillation... Liturgy can only attract people when it looks, not at itself, but at God, when it allows him to enter and act. Then something truly unique happens, beyond competition, and people have a sense that more has taken place than a recreational activity. None of the Christian rites includes dancing.”

      Anybody who argues otherwise should be forced to watch this video one time for each bead on the rosary as penance. Oh crap, wait, we’re against torture aren’t we?

      Labels:

      StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!

      Wednesday, January 06, 2010

      DEAD LETTER OFFICE

      ghost mailbox

      I just wanted to drop a quick note and beg a little forgiveness from all those who take the time to leave comments here. I rely on Blogger to inform me whenever someone leaves a note and I just discovered yesterday that it hasn’t been doing so for almost three weeks now. I’m pretty sure I’ve found the glitch and corrected it, but I still have to backtrack and try to find all the comments I missed and didn’t respond to. If I overlook one or two, please don’t take it as a snub as hearing from all you nice folks is one of my favorite things about doing this blog. Please keep commenting, somebody has to keep me honest.

      Labels:

      StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It!