Let's Scare Jessica to Death (1971) Fresh from a stay in a mental institution, Jessica is picked up by her husband and their best friend and taken to recover in what is supposed to be an empty house in the country. Instead, they discover it occupied by a comely red-haired drifter who ingratiates herself with the group and is invited to stay. Things begin to get strange when Jessica starts hearing voices, but is reluctant to tell anyone because she thinks they'll recommit her. It doesn't help her mental state when the nearby townies tell the friends about a red-haired woman who drowned in the lake next to their house and supposedly now roams the area as a vampire. Jessica wants to dismiss the story, but there's the nagging fact that nearly everyone in town has a band-aid on their neck. Is Jessica losing her mind again, or is the situation as weird as it seems? Honestly, not a lot happens in the movie, but it's so drenched in atmosphere and moodiness you'll just want the nothing to keep happening for as long as it can. A classic in slow-burn '70s cinema.
Given the movie's title, one wonders if the Church thinks it's okay to scare people, not to death obviously, but just in general? Well, there's certainly no encyclical on such an oddball question, but we can piece some thoughts together from various sources. Aquinas warned about play that harms a neighbor, stating, "the pleasure in question should not be sought in indecent or injurious deeds or words." However, as Fr. Francis Spirago noted in The Catechism Explained, "Moderate jesting is not derision if the motive is reasonable and it does not aim at the other person’s confusion." So, it would seem a good scare in the name of mutual amusement or good fun is okay, but not if the goal is to instill true fear, which would be uncharitable and injurious. In short, scare unto others as you would have them scare unto you.
Shock Treatment (1981) Having survived the events of The Rocky Horror Picture Show, Brad and Janet have married and moved to Denton, a town completely under the control of fast food magnate Farley Flavors and his television network DTV. Duped into participating in the game show Marriage Maze, Brad is declared an emotional cripple and committed to a mental institution, while Janet and her parents are seduced into seeking superstardom on some of Farley's popular reality shows. Luckily, reporter Betty Hapschatt is immune to Flavors' influence and has uncovered his true motives for wanting to separate Brad and Janet. But has she made her discovery too late? While nowhere near catching the lightning in a bottle that was Rocky Horror, Shock Treatment really isn't as bad as it was declared upon release. Yes, it's weird having characters from Rocky Horror played by new actors while having actors from Rocky Horror play new characters, but the satire of pop culture zombies hits its mark and some of the new songs are actually decent, so it balances out.
From the way it's portrayed in movies, you'd think shock treatment would be condemned by the Church. Not so. Despite pop culture's continued laughable insistence that Catholicism rejects science, Church-run medical institutions have always followed (within ethical limits) the scientific standards of the time. As noted in the book Psychiatry and Catholicism, methods such as shock treatment are treated as legitimate medical options under the ordinary conditions of proportionality. So, if a person's mental illness is serious enough, there are no better alternatives according to the science, and the benefits outweigh the risks, then shock treatment (electroconvulsive therapy if we want to use the nice word) is allowable. Therefore, since mainstream psychiatry continues to regard modern ECT as safe and highly effective for certain severe cases where medications have proven ineffective, documents like the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services do not prohibit its use.
.jpg)
.jpg)
No comments:
Post a Comment